Retirement income: turning savings into a paycheck that lasts
You spent thirty or forty years mastering one discipline: earning, saving, and letting markets compound. Retirement asks for a different one. The skills that build a portfolio, steady contributions, ignoring downturns, maximizing growth, are not the same skills that turn a portfolio into decades of reliable income. Distribution has its own risks, its own tax rules, and its own order of operations. Getting that order right often matters more than any single investment decision.
Why the order of returns suddenly matters
During your working years, the sequence of market returns is largely irrelevant; a rough stretch early in a career can even help, because contributions buy shares at lower prices. In withdrawal mode, the arithmetic reverses. Selling shares to fund spending during a downturn locks in losses and leaves fewer shares to participate in the recovery. Researchers call this sequence-of-returns risk, and it is the defining financial risk of the first decade of retirement.
You cannot control the sequence. You can control the three levers around it: how much you withdraw, how flexible those withdrawals are, and whether near-term spending is insulated from stocks so that a bad market year never forces a bad sale.
A spending policy beats a rule of thumb
Most people have heard of the 4% guideline. It traces to research published by financial planner William Bengen in 1994, which found that an initial 4% withdrawal, adjusted annually for inflation, had historically survived every 30-year U.S. retirement period he tested. It was a research finding, not a prescription, and subsequent studies have produced both higher and lower figures depending on time horizon, asset allocation, fees, and how flexible the retiree is willing to be.
The more durable idea is a written spending policy. Some households use guardrails: a starting withdrawal rate paired with pre-agreed rules to trim spending modestly after poor markets and allow raises after strong ones. Others prefer a bucket structure, holding one to three years of planned spending in cash and short-term reserves while the remainder stays invested for growth. Still others use a total-return approach, drawing from the whole portfolio and rebalancing as they go. Each has trade-offs, and the right choice depends on temperament as much as math. What matters most is that the policy exists in writing before the first bad market, not after.
Social Security is a coordination decision
For anyone born in 1960 or later, full retirement age is 67, a milestone that fully phased in as of 2026. Claiming at 62 permanently reduces the monthly benefit by about 30%. Waiting past full retirement age earns delayed retirement credits of 8% per year through age 70. Run the Social Security Administration's own arithmetic and the monthly check at 70 comes out roughly three-quarters larger than the check at 62: an inflation-adjusted payment stream that lasts as long as you do.
That does not automatically make waiting right. Health, family longevity, cash needs, and spousal benefits all matter. For married couples, the decision is really about the survivor: when one spouse dies, the smaller check ends and the larger one continues. Delaying the higher earner's benefit is, in effect, purchasing a larger lifetime benefit for whichever spouse lives longest. Delaying also raises the guaranteed income floor, which reduces how hard the portfolio must work in the early years — a quiet hedge against the sequence risk described above.
Two 2026 details worth knowing. Benefits received a 2.8% cost-of-living adjustment this year. And if you claim before full retirement age while still working, the earnings test withholds $1 of benefits for every $2 earned above $24,480 in 2026. Withheld amounts are not lost, however; your benefit is recalculated upward once you reach full retirement age.
Taxes and Medicare don't retire when you do
Required minimum distributions currently begin at age 73, rising to 75 for those born in 1960 or later. Between retirement and that date sits the most valuable tax-planning window most households ever get: income is often temporarily low, and each year's unused lower brackets can be filled deliberately — through partial Roth conversions or by realizing long-term gains at favorable rates, instead of being forfeited. Our companion piece on 2026 tax planning covers the conversion math in detail.
The sequencing of withdrawals across account types — taxable, tax-deferred, and Roth, also deserves design rather than default. The conventional order (taxable first, tax-deferred next, Roth last) is a reasonable starting point, but blending sources year by year to manage brackets frequently does better.
Medicare adds one more layer. The standard Part B premium is $202.90 per month in 2026, and income-related surcharges known as IRMAA begin once modified adjusted gross income exceeds $109,000 for single filers or $218,000 for joint filers — measured on income from two years earlier. Crossing that first threshold by even a dollar adds roughly $975 per person per year for Part B alone. A large withdrawal or conversion in 2026 shows up in 2028 premiums. Tools like qualified charitable distributions, which move IRA dollars to charity without ever affecting adjusted gross income, exist precisely for this coordination problem.
Still working at 50 or older? The 2026 employee deferral limit for 401(k)-type plans is $24,500, with an $8,000 catch-up contribution, or $11,250 for those ages 60 through 63. One notable change took effect this year: if your prior-year wages from your employer exceeded $150,000, catch-up contributions must now be made on a Roth basis.
Put it in writing
A durable retirement income plan fits on a few pages: the spending policy and its guardrails, the Social Security claiming decision and its rationale, the withdrawal order by account type, the Roth conversion and RMD calendar, and the Medicare income thresholds you are managing around. Households that write it down make calmer decisions in bad markets, because the decisions were made in advance.
If you are within five years of retirement, or in the early years of it, this is the planning conversation worth having now. Click here to schedule a meeting with our team.
Important disclosures
The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual.
This information is not intended to be a substitute for specific individualized tax or legal advice. We suggest that you discuss your specific situation with a qualified tax or legal advisor.
Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. No strategy assures success or protects against loss. .
Traditional IRA account owners have considerations to make before performing a Roth IRA conversion. These primarily include income tax consequences on the converted amount in the year of conversion, withdrawal limitations from a Roth IRA, and income limitations for future contributions to a Roth IRA. In addition, if you are required to take a required minimum distribution (RMD) in the year you convert, you must do so before converting to a Roth IRA.
Securities and advisory services offered through LPL Financial, a registered investment advisor, Member FINRA/SIPC.
